top of page

About

The Observatory of Class Actions and other forms of Collective Redress is a Network of Experts, created in 2017 by Maria José Azar-Baud, in order to allow researchers and specialists from all over the world to share information on the different forms of collective action, namely class actions, group actions, popular, representative, and participate in international and interdisciplinary projects.

 

It is also an Information Portal that aims at making the law of collective actions accessible to any interested individual, such as consumers and victims in general, as well as companies, for whom collective actions represent a legal risk that they must now manage.

 

Finally, the Observatory is a Registry of actions initiated, concluded or settled, which we have information about thanks to the follow-up and the contributions of its members and to the work of the students following Maria José Azar-Baud’s courses in French and in European Union Consumer Law, as well as in Consumer Dispute Resolution and Mass Litigation at the Universities of Paris-Saclay, Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and Panthéon-Assas. 

In 2026, the Observatory's website is revamped to reflect new European and International trends. The News section will be updated more frequently and structured around four topics. You will find information on the transposition of the Directive on Representative Actions in the protection of consumers' collective interests, Caselaw regarding Collective Actions on Collective Disputes, and on Events and Publications.

WhatsApp Image 2026-01-19 at 20.41.58.jpeg
Image de Christian Wiediger

Implementation of the Representative Actions Directive across the European Union

Within this dedicated section, readers will find the national legislative instruments adopted by the Member States of the European Union in order to transpose Directive (EU) 2020/1828 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers.

As of today, twenty-five Member States have formally transposed the Directive into their domestic legal orders. Only Spain and Bulgaria have, to date, proceeded with a partial transposition. The legislative materials made available in this section reflect the current state of implementation across the Union and aim to provide a reliable and structured reference point for comparative and practical analysis.

This tab enables readers to access information concerning the manner in which the Directive has been implemented in the various Member States, including the scope of application, the designation and standing of qualified entities, admissibility requirements, funding arrangements, injunctive and redress measures, and the procedural safeguards introduced at national level. The Observatory’s objective is to facilitate a comprehensive and comparative understanding of how the European framework on representative actions has been operationalised within diverse legal traditions and procedural systems.

For further analysis of the broader structural transformations introduced by the Directive and their implications for collective redress in Europe, readers are invited to consult: Maria José AZAR-BAUD, “Winds of Change after the Representative Actions Directive”, published in the Mass Claims Journal.

Image de Mohamed Jamil Latrach

France

The transposition of Directive (EU) 2020/1828 on representative actions marks a significant milestone in the evolution of French collective redress and group litigation mechanisms.

 

It forms part of a broader European harmonisation effort designed to strengthen the effectiveness of consumer protection law, to ensure genuine access to justice for victims of mass harm, and to establish a coherent and safeguarded procedural and financial framework for collective proceedings.

 

France has transposed the Directive through a law and three decrees. This section provides a structured presentation of the French framework resulting from this reform, making available the relevant normative texts and the elements necessary for a rigorous understanding of their scope and interrelation.

Image de Emma Angel

Collective Redress Beyond the European Union

In this dedicated section, readers will find structured and reliable information concerning collective redress mechanisms existing outside the European Union. This includes class actions, representative actions, popular actions, collective claims, and other forms of group litigation developed in non-EU jurisdictions.

The materials gathered herein aim to provide an accurate overview of the legal frameworks governing collective proceedings in third countries, with particular attention to standing requirements, admissibility thresholds, certification mechanisms where applicable, funding structures, redress models, distribution schemes, and judicial oversight.

By mapping and analysing these diverse procedural architectures, the Observatory seeks to foster a comparative understanding of collective redress across legal systems and to situate the European model within a broader global landscape. This section is designed to serve academics, practitioners, policymakers, litigation funders, judges, and civil society actors interested in the evolution of mass litigation beyond the boundaries of the European Union.
 

30
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Day (1/2)
Perfect Law – Global Class Actions & Mass Torts Conference London 2026
23
Day (2/2)
Perfect Law – Global Class Actions & Mass Torts Conference London 2026
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
  • Perfect Law – Global Class Actions & Mass Torts Conference London 2026
    Perfect Law – Global Class Actions & Mass Torts Conference London 2026
    Apr 22, 2026, 9:00 AM – Apr 23, 2026, 8:00 PM
    Londres, Londres, Royaume-Uni
    An international conference dedicated to global class actions and mass tort litigation, bringing together leading practitioners, funders, academics, and judicial experts to examine emerging trends, procedural developments, and cross-border strategies in collective redress.
bottom of page